Early History of the Culture of Peace
Postscripts January 2004 and December 2009 Page 40

Introduction and UNESCO's Mandate
Page 1

Yamousoukro and Seville Statement
Page 2

Origins and Executive Board Adoption
Pages 3 - 4

Launching the Programme: El Salvador and Roundtable
Pages 5 - 6 - 7

1993 General Conference
Page 8

National Projects
Pages 9 - 10

Programme Unit
Page 11

Toward a Global Scope
Pages 12 - 13

Transdisciplinary Project and Human Right to Peace
Pages 14 - 15 - 16

1997: A New Approach
Page 17

UN General Assembly Resolutions
Page 18

Resolution for International Year
Page 19

Declaration and Programme of Action
Pages 20 - 21

Resolution for International Decade
Pages 22 - 23

Training Programmes
Page 24

Global Movement
Pages 25 - 26

Publicity Campaign
Pages 27 - 28

Decentralized Network
Pages 29 - 30

Manifesto 2000
Page 31

Use of Internet
Pages 32 - 33

Future of the Culture of Peace
Pages 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38

Annexes and Documentation
Page 39


As mentioned with regard to the origins of the culture of peace, it was born at a very particular moment of history, "the end of the Cold War which made possible unanimous action by the UN Security Council and which led to peacekeeping operations and the document An Agenda for Peace (1992)."

Looking back on that moment with the hindsight of twelve years, it seems that it was both a remarkable window of opportunity, and perhaps a window through which one can view the future.

It was a window of opportunity for the development of peace initiatives by the United Nations, but the window did not stay open for long. Within a very few years it was no longer possible to fund programs for a culture of peace, and the United Nations, in general, was once more dominated by the culture of war.

At the same time that moment may have provided us with a window into the future, providing us a clue as to how humankind can overcome the paradox of achieving a culture of peace despite the fact that the nation state, itself, continues to be the agent of the culture of war.

To understand this more clearly, it is worth re-reading a preface that I wrote (but did not submit) in 1992 to the UNESCO Director-General, providing an historical context for the proposal for a culture of peace programme.

As the preface describes, in 1992 there were many failed states, where the United Nations was given jurisdiction. In theory, the United Nations was in a position to rebuild the nation state along new lines on the basis of a culture of peace instead of a culture of war. Although the UNESCO Culture of Peace Programme did not state this objective very clearly, with hindsight one can see that it was an implied objective. In fact, it could be argued that the very opportunity of the United Nations at that moment to engage in "nation-building" provided a stimulus to the more explicit analysis and formulation of the culture of peace which was later expressed in the United Nations Programme of Action adopted in 1999.

As for the future, it seems likely that the world will once again go through a period of war and failed states. Once again, the revulsion to war may open a window of opportunity for the culture of peace. If so, the opportunity should be seized and the United Nations empowered to begin the establishment in these failed states of a new kind of nation state based on the principles of a culture of peace as described in the UN Programme of Action.

Note added in December 2009: My thinking has evolved in the last few years, and I have now proposed a concrete strategy for the transition to a culture of peace in my new books: World Peace through the Town Hall and I Have Seen the Promised Land. Looking back 5 years to the above postscript and 17 years to the preface that I did not give to Mr Mayor, one can see clearly the direction of this evolution. In fact, it requires giving up the assumption that peace will come through reform of the state and seeking a United Nations that is based upon local governments rather than Member States.

previous page
home page
next page