|
References | Page 10 |
I. Introduction
II. A Politically Useful Myth
III. Institutional Is Different from Individual Behavior
IV. Male Animals Are Not consistently More Aggressive Than Females
V. The Complex Relation of Human Aggression to Animal Aggression
VI. Conclusion
References
|
Adams, D. B. (1983a). Why there are so few women warriors. Behavior Science Research, 18, 196-212. Adams, D. B. (1984). There is no instinct for war. Psychological Journal (Moscow), 5, 140-144. Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and Aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag. Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160. Calhoun, J. B. (1962). The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat. Public Health Service Publication 1008. DeBold, J. F., & Miczek, K. A. (1984). Aggression persists after ovariectomy in female rats. Hormones and Behavior, 18, 177-190. Eaton, G. G. (1976). The social order of Japanese macaques. Scientific American, 235,96-106. Eckhardt, W. (1972). Crosscultural theories of war and aggression. International Journal of Group Tensions, 2, 36-50. Groebel, J., & Hinde, R. A. (1989). Aggression and war: Their biological and social bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Lagerspetz, K. (1985). Are wars caused by aggression. In F. L. Denmark (Ed.), Social/Ecological Psychology and the Psychology of Women. Elsevier (North-Holland). Murdock, G. (1937). Comparative data on the division of labor by sex. Social Forces, 15,551-553. Somit, A. (1990). Review essay: Humans, chimps, and Bonobos: The biological bases of aggression, war, and peacemaking. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34, 553-582.
|